USE CASE: How Radeus Labs Tackled AI Deployment Challenges with a Cloud-Based Chatbot

by | Jun 24, 2025 | Computing

AI is changing how teams manage information and interact with customers—but making it work securely and affordably inside your own organization is a different story. When we set out to build an internal AI chatbot, we had a dual mission: 1) improve how our team accessed technical product information and 2) give our interns meaningful experience working with artificial intelligence.

71 percent ai toolsBut with recent analysis showing that 71.7% of AI tools used in the workplace are classified as high or critical risk (Cyberhaven), we knew we had to tread carefully. We saw the potential—faster answers for customer-facing staff, streamlined support, and real-world AI experience—but executing it with a cloud-based model brought more complexity than we expected.

What started as a promising solution soon became a lesson in the practical realities of deploying AI in a secure, cost-conscious environment. In this use case, we share the goals we set, the challenges we faced, what worked, what didn’t, and why it pushed us to reevaluate our infrastructure.

 

Specific Challenges with Cloud-Based AI

Initially, our chatbot showed promising results, significantly accelerating responses to technical queries and enhancing customer support interactions. However, we soon encountered several substantial challenges:

  • AI Hallucinations: Our chatbot occasionally provided incorrect or misleading responses—commonly known as "AI hallucinations." This required continuous model retraining, extensive prompt refinement, and frequent manual validation, consuming significant developer and intern hours.
  • Limited VRAM Capacity: Cloud GPU instances often lacked sufficient VRAM for efficient model training and rapid iterations, severely slowing down refinement processes and delaying critical updates.
  • Escalating Cloud Costs: The cloud provider’s pay-per-training pricing model quickly became unsustainable, as repeated refinements drove up operational expenses significantly, raising concerns about long-term financial viability.
  • Initial Technical Missteps: Initially, we attempted to embed all information directly into the chatbot's instructions, not realizing that employing a vector store was the correct approach. This oversight caused early inefficiencies and extended development time.
  • Technical Setbacks: We faced several technical hurdles, including persistent cross-origin resource sharing (CORS) errors with our browser extension, token limit challenges causing incomplete chatbot responses, and accidental deletion of the bot during API testing, resulting in significant data loss due to infrequent backups.

Impact and Lessons Learned

Despite these setbacks, the chatbot delivered considerable benefits:

  • Drastically reduced technical inquiry response times.
  • Improved internal knowledge sharing and accuracy of responses.
  • Provided our interns with valuable, real-world AI training and experience.

The challenges we faced taught us several critical lessons:

  • Frequent backups are essential to mitigate potential data loss and downtime.
  • Infrastructure efficiency and careful token management significantly affect operational costs and scalability.
  • Continuous refinement and validation are crucial to maintain chatbot accuracy and reliability.

Although overall, we find cloud-based Chatbots a great approach for information that is already available to the general public, training them on anything related to our IP or internal facing documents is a risk we are not willing to take.

Why Radeus Labs is Evaluating On-Premise AI Solutions

These experiences highlighted the inherent limitations and hidden costs of relying exclusively on cloud-based AI infrastructure—particularly in terms of security, data control, and scalability. Consequently, we at Radeus Labs are actively exploring an on-premise AI server solution to:

  • Strengthen our data security and enhance compliance.
  • Stabilize infrastructure costs by transitioning to predictable, fixed expenses.
  • Improve flexibility, performance, and reliability with optimized local hardware.

A Safer Path Forward: On-Prem AI for Security-Focused Teams

For organizations like ours that handle sensitive data or hold government contracts, cloud-based AI tools introduce significant compliance and security risks. Concerns about data sovereignty, vendor lock-in, and inadvertent data exposure have driven us to develop a safer and more strategic approach.

Ebook Digital Reader To support others navigating similar challenges, we've compiled our experiences and insights into a comprehensive guide: AI Security and Compliance: Why Cloud Isn’t Always Safe Enough.This ebook explores the strategic advantages of deploying AI servers on-premise, covering:

  • How on-prem AI enhances compliance with critical frameworks such as CMMC, NIST, ISO/IEC 27001, and GDPR.
  • Risks associated with cloud-based AI deployments, including data leakage, vendor lock-in, and uncontrolled data exposure.
  • Practical strategies for deploying secure, scalable AI infrastructure locally.
  • Real-world advice on reducing operational risks and maintaining control over sensitive data.

Get the insights you need to deploy AI with greater security and control. Download our guide now to discover how adopting an on-premise AI approach can safeguard your business and ensure compliance in today's rapidly evolving regulatory landscape.

Blog

See Our Latest Blog Posts

I/ITSEC 2025: The Trends in Simulation Worth Paying Attention To

itsec 2025-radeus team-ck tan leading technolgy

After a year of AI dominated headlines, I/ITSEC 2025 brought the conversation back to infrastructure. This show was about systems, sustainability, and the real engineering work that keeps training and simulation programs running

And for Radeus Labs, this year felt different; busier, more technical, and packed with the right people in the right conversations.

Here’s what stood out.

MTBF: What It Actually Means and How to Use It Correctly

You're evaluating GPU computing platforms for a mission-critical deployment. Vendor A quotes an MTBF of 100,000 hours. Vendor B claims 150,000 hours. The choice seems obvious: go with Vendor B for 50% better reliability, right?

Not so fast.

If you're making hardware decisions based on MTBF comparisons alone, you're likely making decisions based on incomplete, or worse, misunderstood, information. Mean Time Between Failures remains one of the most widely cited yet most profoundly misunderstood metrics in reliability engineering. And for defense, aerospace, and mission-critical computing environments where failure isn't just inconvenient but potentially catastrophic, this misunderstanding carries real consequences.

Let's set the record straight on what MTBF actually tells you, what it doesn't, and how to use it properly alongside other reliability tools.

SC25: High Performance Computing Meets the AI-Driven Future in St. Louis

A few weeks ago, the Radeus Labs team joined thousands of HPC professionals, researchers, and developers in St. Louis for SC25, the International Conference for High Performance Computing, Networking, Storage, and Analysis. What we found was a conference at an inflection point, where traditional supercomputing meets the explosive demands of AI infrastructure, and where the future of connectivity is being built in real-time.